|
17 MARCH 1898 |
CONSTITUTION CONVENTION |
|
1 JANUARY 1901 |
AUSTRALIA |
|
13 May 1999 High Court of Australia judges betray their oath of alliance to the British Crown by pretending there is judicial powers in blatant disregard to constitutional judicial constrains. pretend independence where none exist. |
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
19 July 2006 COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA
Judicial determination to uphold all submissions of Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka, in both, cases on appeal regarding constitutional and other legal issues.
See also;
A book on CD on Australians political, religious & other rights
ISBN 0-9751760-2-1 (prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-2-3
This book was published on 6-7-2006 and filed as evidence in the appeals, containing all documentation filed in the County Court of Victoria by Mr G. H.Schorel-Hlavka, including his numerous submissions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29 May 2009 Launch of the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN, a constitutional council, to advise the Government, the People, the Parliament and the Courts about constitutional powers and limitations.


Currently the various teritories added to the Commonwealth of Australia feel beingleft out in that there is no common flag that includes them. When Patrick Byrt QC asked me to design a common flag that would include also territories we had a commonucation channel that resulted the final product shown below on 25 October 2004.sincethen the flag has been used in closure of all my letterheads (footings).

IMPORTANT NOTICE:
To whom it may concern,
Please do understand that while Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second is still on the throne we can safely assume matters will continue with Her Majesty, however were she to abdicate or die then many an agitator or others may seek to use the opportunity to proclaim the REPUBLICAN/MONARCHISTIC views and more then likely to the detriment of the general public.
The OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN is seeking to advocate the true position of the constitution and how its applies and it is essential that all people are now concerned about this and not wait until the Queen is no longer at the throne and we are suddenly forced to accept some pretended solution that really does nothing but seeking to install more power for those already abusing and misusing their powers and failing to act where required and the general public suffers as a whole.
.
My issue isn’t if a republican or a monarchistic view is more desired but that the people are not swindled into voting for some form of system that fraudulently has been presented. We need to be clear as to any future choice and it is so to say no skin of the nose of the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN if the electors were to vote to have a monarchy or republican system rather that any such decision should be an “informed” decision on what is truly applicable and as yet where even a mere 7 judges of the High Court of Australia often are so to say in a fist fight about certain constitutional meanings and application then if we cannot trust them then surely we cannot trust politicians. Hence, support the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN and ensures it’s information is considered so that “YOU” ultimately may be able to make an “informed” decision when asked to do so!
.
Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka , GUARDIAN 8-7-2009